Zachary Cook, Elizabeth Hanna, Harmony Jovey, Joseph Ammon Martin, Tyler McDonald, Shelby Randquist, George Rivera, Amy Sachs; Utah Valley University
Sociology and Criminology
National data concerning citizens’ opinions toward the death penalty is already available, but this data has a serious limitation because only 35 states allow for use of the death penalty (called retentionist states), and each of them uses it differently, so it makes little sense to look at national trends and attitudes and try to apply them to a particular state. It appears that the best method is to explore the attitudes within each retentionist jurisdiction (state) with the goal of obtaining data that will en- able attitudes to be compared and contrasted based on defined variables. This study explores the attitudes of Utah residents in two phases. In the first phase, 6,000 postal surveys were sent to a random sample of Utah residents in six purposively chosen cities (based on representative demographics). This instrument contained questions used in existing instruments and addition- al questions designed to address attitudes specific to the death penalty. The second phase consists of in-depth interviews with survey-respondents who strongly support the death penalty and strongly oppose the death penalty. They will be asked to elaborate on their responses to the postal survey questions and to describe which factors most influence their opinions concerning the death penalty.