Skip to main content
Utah's Foremost Platform for Undergraduate Research Presentation
2013 Abstracts

Hydrogeochemistry, Geothermometry, and Structural Setting of Thermal Springs in Northern Utah and Southwestern Idaho

Brennan Young, Utah State University

Geology

Thermal springs in northern Utah and southeastern Idaho mostly lie near active or inactive Basin-and-Range normal faults. They are dynamic systems, and the character of some has changed drastically since work as early as the 1980’s (Blackett and Wakefield, 2002; IDWR, 2001). We examined and sampled 60 thermal springs and most samples met criteria for cation geothermometers, or mathematical-geochemical tools used to estimate the maximum temperature of hydrothermal reservoirs. Of the 60 springs, 51 met criteria for the Na-K-Ca geothermometer and the remaining nine springs did not meet the criteria for the K-Mg, Na-K, Na-K-Ca, or Na-K-Ca-Mg cation geothermometers used in this project (Fournier and Truesdell, 1973; Fournier and Potter, 1979; Giggenbach, 1988). Of those 51 springs, only one is considered to be in partial equilibrium with the thermal reservoir, and estimates a reservoir temperature of 79°C (Giggenbach, 1988). Though the majority of springs exhibit a chemical signature of having mixed with shallow groundwater (Giggenbach, 1988), the Na-K-Ca geothermometer gives the most reliable results for springs in northern Utah and southeastern Idaho, but only for springs with surface temperatures exceeding 30°C and with greater than 1000 ppm total dissolved solids (TDS). Geothermometer results for these springs yield reservoir temperature estimates between 193 and 249°C.