Greenhalgh, Mitchell; Merrill, Alex; Lopez, David; Lefevre, Sam; Williams, Greg (Brigham Young University)
Faculty Advisor: Abbott, Ben (Brigham Young University, Plant and Wildlife Sciences)
The presence of sand and gravel pits around Utah are usually accompanied by public complaints of increased negative health outcomes. The primary risk from these areas is crystalline silica (CS)—the molecule released into the air as a result of crushing rocks and sand. Literature has given mixed results of the potentially harmful effects of crystalline silica. To address the potential health risk of Utah residents from living near sand pits, we performed a meta-analysis on CS-related literature to estimate the true effects of CS on human health. We then used GIS software to estimate the total population in Utah that lives within a 5000-meter buffer of the sand pits in Utah. Using Utah cancer data, birth data, and hospital emergency department data, we created risk ratios for residents within the buffer. The meta-analysis concluded that CS is a weak lung carcinogen. Other research suggests that air pollution leads to low birth weight and preterm births. In our study, lung cancer rates were significantly lower in populations within the 5000-meter buffer. We found no evidence of significant adverse birth outcomes as a result of living in close proximity to sand and gravel pits. Non-malignant respiratory disease also had significantly lower rates within the buffer. These findings are important in determining the role of sand/gravel pit operations in disease incidence in surrounding communities. More research is needed to evaluate confounding factors such as smoking prevalence and socioeconomic status and to investigate crystalline silica in non-occupational settings.