Bergen, Makenna; Meier, Amanda; Thomas, Victoria; Banna, Jinan; Cluskey, Mary; Stokes, Nathan; Richards, Rickelle (Brigham Young University)
Faculty Advisor: Richards, Rickelle (Life Sciences; Nutrition, Dietetics, and Food Science); Stokes, Nathan (Life Sciences; Nutrition, Dietetics, and Food Science); Banna, Jinan (Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources (University of Hawaii at Manoa), Department of Human Nutrition, Food, and Animal Sciences)
Background: Food insecurity among college students has been reported to be as high as 59%. Most research related to this phenomenon has used quantitative approaches. The purpose of this study was to gain a deeper understanding of college students' perceptions of their own food security using qualitative methodology.
Methods: Researchers interviewed 57 college students at three universities across the western United States. A random sample of transcripts were independently coded in NVivo to determine interrater reliability. Kappa statistics ranged from 0.44-0.99 (food insecure) and from 0.73-0.99 (food secure), indicating moderate to almost perfect agreement. Percent agreement ranged from 92-100% (food insecure) and from 97-100% (food secure). Researchers then divided transcripts for final coding and overarching themes, including differences between food secure and food insecure students under each theme, were discussed.
Results: Three themes emerged to help explain drivers of food insecurity in college students: 1) transition from pre-college life to college life; 2) students' management of finances; and 3) methods and barriers to obtaining food. Differences were identified between food secure and food insecure students. Food insecure students prioritized other living expenses over food and used various strategies when funds were low: purchasing lowest cost campus meal plans, stretching food budget, buying cheaper groceries, and skipping meals. In regards to eating away-from-home, food insecure students prioritized eating at home, using discounts, or waiting to get paid before eating out. Both food secure and food insecure students reported positive aspects of using food assistance programs but believed stigma and embarrassment would deter students from using these programs. A few food insecure students expressed confusion about qualifying for these programs.
Conclusions: This study helps us better understand the context surrounding food insecurity in college students. This understanding could lead to broader solutions to helping college students become more food secure.