White, Justin; Dahl, AnnElise; Harmison, Dillon; Klein, Jenni; Lemons, Anne; Simmons, Jordan; Mansfield, Cade; White, Leigh (Weber State University)
Faculty Advisor: Mansfield, Cade (Weber State University, Psychology); Shaw, Leigh (Weber State University, Psychology)
Contrary to stereotypes, past research indicates that people become more emotionally positive across adulthood. Socio-emotional Selectivity Theory posits that with shortened time horizons over the lifespan people focus more on emotional satisfaction and meaning in life (Carstensen, Isaacowitz, & Charles, 1999). This "positivity effect", is found in the fact that relative to younger adults, older adults show biases toward superior processing of positively valenced emotional stimuli (Carstensen & Mikels, 2005). Personal relationships are a key source of satisfaction and emotional well-being and from the standpoint of Socio-emotional Selectivity theory, positivity in relationships is thought to be highly prioritized by older adults. Yet, according to classic and contemporary developmental psychological theories such as Erikson's Psychosocial theory of development and Arnett's theory of emerging adulthood, younger adults should also prioritize positivity in relational functioning. There has been less theory and research that has focused on understanding how midlife adults process emotionally rich relational experiences. To better understand emotional and cognitive processes across adulthood, the current study explores age-related differences in the emotional impact of a difficult relational experience (a time one perpetrated harm against another) and age-related differences in the linguistic features of adults' narratives of these experiences. Two hundred and eighteen adults ranging in age from 20 to 69 were recruited to participate in the study through Amazon's Mechanical Turk platform. Participants were asked to recall a time when they did something that negatively impacted a personally important relationship and to then vividly recall it for 2 minutes. Then they completed a battery of questionnaires about the memory. Finally, participants wrote narratives about the memory. Data are being analyzed only for those participants who recalled memories consistent with the prompt and passed attention checks during the protocol (n = 194, female = 110, Mean Age = 43.32, SD = 13.82).