Authors: Anthony Cornwall, Jake Rhea, Travis Ficklin
Mentors: Travis Ficklin
Insitution: Utah Tech University
The purpose of this study was to examine the correlation among various barbell tracking methods for both validity and between-method variability. Back squat and snatch lifts were simultaneously tracked using three systems: a corded linear transducer system (Tendo), a laser-based system (Flex), and a reflective marker multi-camera motion capture system (3D). The 3D system was considered a gold standard for validation. Nine repetitions each of barbell back squat and a snatch lifts were executed. Each system simultaneously tracked peak velocity, peak power, mean velocity, mean power, and displacement of the barbell for both lifts. All correlations were tested using Pearson Product Moment, with alpha set a priori at 0.05. Correlations among tracking methods were high for the back squat, and considerably lower for the snatch lift. Correlations for displacement were poor among all methods (-0.63 < r < 0.65). Correlations for velocities and powers were strong in the back squat (0.79 < r < 0.99), but weak-to-moderate for the snatch (-0.31 < r < 0.63). A discussion will be presented of tracking methods and lift mechanics, which can explain some, but not all, disparities among methods.